Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand why caesarean sections are performed for stillborn babies by investigating caesarean section rates and indications in sub-Saharan African countries and to examine whether fetal vital status at admission is associated with caesarean section. METHODS: The study involved registry data on 105 872 babies weighing 1000 g or more born to women aged 13 to 50 years at 16 hospitals in Benin, Malawi, Uganda and United Republic of Tanzania between 1 July 2021 and 30 June 2023. We assessed caesarean section rates and indications, and used multivariable logistic regression analyses to estimate associations between fetal heartbeat at admission and caesarean section, by birth outcome. FINDINGS: The caesarean section rate was 28.0% (29 640/105 872) overall, 40.9% (858/2098) for intrapartum stillbirths and 19.0% (322/1694) for antepartum stillbirths. Previous caesarean section was among the top three indications across birth outcomes. Information on fetal heartbeat at admission was unavailable for 24.7% (7312/29 640) of caesarean section births. Multivariable analysis showed that the odds of a caesarean section was significantly higher when fetal heartbeat was not reported compared with the detection of a heartbeat among both antepartum (adjusted odds ratio, aOR: 2.55; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.53-4.26) and intrapartum (aOR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.51-2.87) stillbirths. CONCLUSION: Unknown fetal heartbeat at admission was associated with a higher odds of caesarean section, possibly due to attempts to provide optimum care given diagnostic uncertainty. Decision-making processes on the mode of birth need to be better understood and feasible fetal monitoring recommendations are required for low-resource settings.