Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the coronary microvascular responses to multiple, mechanistically distinct hyperaemic agents exert similar dilatory responses or share common clinical predictors. This study therefore sought to characterize the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) response to multiple hyperaemic agents in the human coronary circulation. METHODS: Thermodilution-derived IMR was determined during intravenous adenosine, intracoronary acetylcholine, and intravenous dobutamine in patients with ischemic symptoms and nonobstructive coronary angiograms. A total of 128 patients were studied (44 with adenosine and acetylcholine, and 84 with all agents). Adenosine IMR >25, acetylcholine IMR >31, and dobutamine IMR >29 were used to define elevated responses. RESULTS: IMR responses demonstrated weak-to-moderate association (adenosine vs acetylcholine IMR: ρ = 0.33; adenosine vs dobutamine IMR: ρ = 0.51; acetylcholine vs dobutamine IMR: ρ = 0.28; all P < 0.01). Logistic regression analyses revealed that: (1) elevated adenosine IMR was associated with increasing age and left ventricle hypertrophy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27 and 1.58; both P < 0.05, respectively), (2) elevated acetylcholine IMR was associated with increasing plasma uric acid (OR = 1.09; P < 0.05), and (3) elevated dobutamine IMR was associated with hypertension and left atrial volume index (OR = 3.99 and 1.07; both P < 0.05, respectively). Subset analyses to evaluate clinical utility of the acetylcholine and dobutamine IMR, independent of abnormal adenosine IMR, revealed that elevated acetylcholine and/or dobutamine IMR were associated with higher risk exercise stress tests, left atrial volumes, and burden of exertional chest pain. CONCLUSIONS: Microvascular-specific IMR responses to different hyperaemic agents are only moderately associated, whereas the predictors for agent-specific IMR responses varied, suggesting that multiple pharmacologic agents interrogate different microvascular control mechanisms.