Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Previous research has indicated an association between hearing impairment (HI) and daily-life fatigue. However, the temporal and contextual correlates of such fatigue are largely unexplored. The present study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine (1) whether people with HI are more fatigued than people with normal hearing, (2) whether individuals with HI and normal hearing (NH) show similar diurnal patterns of fatigue, (3) whether people with HI spend less time in challenging listening situations compared with NH controls, and (4) whether more challenging listening situations are associated with more fatigue and whether hearing ability influences any observed association. DESIGN: After excluding 22 participants with self-reported fatiguing health conditions from analyses, the participant sample consisted of 24 adults with HI and 20 adults with NH, aged 44 to 77 years (M = 65.4, SD = 7.5). Data were collected using smartphones and a commercially available EMA app, which ran the specified EMA protocol for this study. Participants responded to six smartphone surveys per day for two weeks. "In-the-moment" questions asked participants to report on their listening situation and to rate their current level of fatigue ("momentary fatigue") at quasi-random time points throughout the day. Data were analyzed using multilevel modeling. RESULTS: Hearing group (HI versus NH) was unrelated to trait, daily, and momentary fatigue; both participants with HI and NH became increasingly fatigued throughout the day and at a similar rate. Challenging listening situations occurred infrequently both for HI and NH groups. Participants with NH were more likely to report that there were people speaking in the background whom they were trying to ignore, but participants with HI were more likely to report a greater number of background speakers. No associations were found between within-person listening situations and momentary fatigue, but person-mean listening activity and conversational status were related to momentary fatigue. Notably, having tinnitus was positively related to momentary fatigue, after controlling for other covariates. Finally, having a fatiguing health condition was a strong predictor of both trait and momentary fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to explore and compare fatigue across HI and NH groups using EMA. Contrary to expectations, the groups showed similar levels and diurnal patterns of fatigue, and fatigue was mostly unrelated to aspects of the listening environment. Between-person differences, although statistically significant, produced small effect sizes and therefore must be accepted cautiously. Issues with group matching, the measurement of fatigue, and perceived hearing-related difficulties among participants with NH are notable limitations. However, this study makes a novel contribution to both EMA and hearing research and demonstrates the importance of screening for fatiguing health conditions. Further research is warranted, particularly with individuals with more severe HI.