CO 2 Laser Versus Surgical Deroofing for the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Tunnels: A Comparative Multicentric, Retrospective Study

二氧化碳激光与手术去顶治疗化脓性汗腺炎隧道:一项多中心回顾性比较研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tunnels of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are one of the most challenging aspects to manage, and different surgical techniques have been proposed for their treatment. CO 2 laser and surgical deroofing are 2 of the most widely used techniques, but no studies have compared them directly. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and outcomes of CO 2 laser treatment versus surgical deroofing for HS tunnels, with a focus on healing time, complication rates, pain perception, and cosmetic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors performed a multicentric retrospective analysis of 20 patients with HS tunnels who were treated with either CO 2 laser ( n = 10) or surgical deroofing ( n = 10). The primary end point was to compare the 2 procedures in terms of healing time, complication rates, pain, and cosmetic outcome. Outcome measures included Visual Analog Scale for pain, the Vancouver Scar Scale for scar evaluation, and the relapse rate at 6 months. Secondary end point included the identification of variables associated with the healing time. RESULTS: The mean time to healing was 4.7 ± 1.9 weeks in the CO 2 laser group and 10.9 ± 4.1 weeks in the surgical deroofing group ( p < .01). Pain score at the first dressing change was lower in the CO 2 laser group, with a mean Visual Analog Scale score of 1.7 ± 0.8 in the CO 2 laser group and 4.9 ± 1.7 in the surgical deroofing group ( p < .01). The mean scar evaluation score using the Vancouver Scar Scale at 6-month follow-up was 2.5 ± 1.3 in the CO 2 laser group and 3.4 ± 1.1 in the surgical deroofing group. The number of postprocedural complications was low in both groups (1 in the CO 2 laser group and 3 in the surgical deroofing group). The proportion of patients achieving complete healing of the tunnels at 6 months was similar among the CO 2 laser and the surgical deroofing group (90% in the CO 2 laser group vs 80% in the surgical group). CONCLUSION: CO 2 laser is a safe and effective treatment for HS tunnels, with fast healing rates and low pain perception.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。