Protective effects of new femoral reaming techniques (Reamer irrigator aspirator, RIA I and II) on pulmonary function and posttraumatic contusion (CT morphology) - results from a standardized large animal model

新型股骨扩孔技术(扩孔器冲洗抽吸器、RIA I 和 II)对肺功能和创伤后挫伤(CT 形态学)的保护作用 - 来自标准化大型动物模型的结果

阅读:6
作者:Sascha Halvachizadeh, Michel Teuben, Max Lempert, Yannik Kalbas, Nikola Cesarovic, Miriam Lipiski, Emanuel Benninger, Paolo Cinelli, Roman Pfeifer, Hans-Christoph Pape

Conclusion

Both RIA 1 and RIA 2 protect the lung from reaming induced dysfunction and have no systemic inflammatory effects, while the negative effects were more sustained after reamed or unreamed nailing. Both RIA 1 and RIA II appear to be of value in terms of a Safe Definitive Surgery (SDS) strategy.

Methods

In a standardized porcine model, (moderate blunt chest trauma, abdominal injury and femoral shaft fracture), the femur was submitted to intramedullary nailing after resuscitation and normalization of pulmonary function. The treatment groups included 3 reamer types (Group RFN: conventional reaming with Synream; group RIA1; reamer irrigator aspirator, version 2005; group RIA 2; reamer irrigator aspirator, version 2019) and were compared to unreamed femoral nailing (Group UFN). Pulmonary function measurements included arterial partial carbon-dioxide pressure (paCO2 [kPa]) (baseline, post reaming, 2,4,6 h) and volumetric measures of contusion in chest computer tomography (CT) (at 6 hrs.). Systemic inflammatory response was measured at baseline and every second hour until six hours after trauma.

Results

This study included 24 male animals, mean weight 50.76 ± 4.1 kg n = 6 per group). Group RFN developed a significantly higher partial CO2 (pCO2) at one hour after reaming when compared with all other groups (7.4 ± 0.4 kPa versus 5.4 ± 0.6 RIA 1, 5.6 ± 0.4 RIA 2, and 5.5 ± 0.5 UFN, p < 0.001), along with a had lower pO2 (12.3 ± 1.3 kPa versus 17.2 ± 1.9 RIA 1, 17.4 ± 1.6 RIA 2, and 16.4 ± 0.7 UFN, p < 0.001) and the degree of pulmonary hyperdense changes in the CT analysis was higher in RFN (485.2 ± 98.5 cm3 versus 344.4 ± 74.4 cm3 RIA 1 and 335.2 ± 58.1 cm3 RIA 2, p < 0.01). The inflammatory reaction was lowest in both RIA groups when compared with group RFN or UFN (p < 0.001).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。