The choice of internal fixator for fractures around the femoral trochanter depends on area classification

股骨大转子周围骨折内固定器的选择取决于骨折部位分类。

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: In femoral trochanteric fractures, fractures whose fracture lines extend to the basal neck or to the subtrochanteric part have high instability. Area classification can identify such instable fractures. The best choices of internal fixators for femoral trochanteric fractures were investigated according to area classification. METHODS: Femoral trochanteric fractures were investigated with respect to area classification. In area classification, the proximal femur is divided into 4 areas with 3 boundary lines: Line-1 is the center of the neck; Line-2 is the border between the neck and the trochanteric zone; and Line-3 links the inferior borders of the greater and lesser trochanters. A fracture in only the third area was classified as type 3; one in the second and third areas was classified as type 2-3. RESULTS: Of 284 femoral trochanteric fractures, 50.0 % were type 3, 21 % were type 2-3, 22 % were type 3-4, and 7.4 % were type 2-3-4. Cases with cut-out or excessive telescoping of the internal fixator were defined as the Failure-group; 5.3 % of type 3 and 10.9 % of type 2-3 were in the Failure-group only when short femoral nails with a single rag screw were used. On the other hand, there were no Failure-group cases of type 2-3 with double rag screws. Only 1 case involved a long nail for type 3, while a long nail was used in about half of type 3-4 cases (Chi square test: P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A double rag screw should be considered for type 2-3. A long nail should be considered for type 3-4.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。