Abstract
One-dimensional (1-D) arterial blood flow modelling was tested in a series of idealized vascular geometries representing the abdominal aorta, common carotid and iliac arteries with different sizes of stenoses and/or aneurysms. Three-dimensional (3-D) modelling and in vitro measurements were used as ground truth to assess the accuracy of 1-D model pressure and flow waves. The 1-D and 3-D formulations shared identical boundary conditions and had equivalent vascular geometries and material properties. The parameters of an experimental set-up of the abdominal aorta for different aneurysm sizes were matched in corresponding 1-D models. Results show the ability of 1-D modelling to capture the main features of pressure and flow waves, pressure drop across the stenoses and energy dissipation across aneurysms observed in the 3-D and experimental models. Under physiological Reynolds numbers (Re), root mean square errors were smaller than 5.4% for pressure and 7.3% for the flow, for stenosis and aneurysm sizes of up to 85% and 400%, respectively. Relative errors increased with the increasing stenosis and aneurysm size, aneurysm length and Re, and decreasing stenosis length. All data generated in this study are freely available and provide a valuable resource for future research.