Abstract
Living systems regulate many aspects of their behaviour through periodic oscillations of molecular concentrations, which function as 'biochemical clocks.' The chemical reactions that drive these clocks are intrinsically stochastic at the molecular level, so that the duration of a full oscillation cycle is subject to random fluctuations. Their success in carrying out their biological function is thought to depend on the degree to which these fluctuations in the cycle period can be suppressed. Biochemical oscillators also require a constant supply of free energy in order to break detailed balance and maintain their cyclic dynamics. For a given free energy budget, the recently discovered 'thermodynamic uncertainty relation' yields the magnitude of period fluctuations in the most precise conceivable free-running clock. In this paper, we show that computational models of real biochemical clocks severely underperform this optimum, with fluctuations several orders of magnitude larger than the theoretical minimum. We argue that this suboptimal performance is due to the small number of internal states per molecule in these models, combined with the high level of thermodynamic force required to maintain the system in the oscillatory phase. We introduce a new model with a tunable number of internal states per molecule and confirm that it approaches the optimal precision as this number increases.