Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. Cervical cancer usually develops from human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, which leads to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN1/2/3) and eventually invasive cervical cancer. Therefore, early-screening and detection of cervical lesions are crucial for preventing and treating cervical cancer. However, different regions have different levels of medical resources and availability of diagnostic methods. There is a need to compare the efficiency of different methods and combinations for detecting cervical lesions and provide recommendations for the optimal screening and detection strategies. Methods: The current clinical methods for screening and detection of cervical lesions mainly include TruScreen (TS), Thinprep cytologic test (TCT), HPV testing, and colposcopy, but their sensitivity and specificity vary and there is no standard protocol recommended. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed 2286 female samples that underwent cervical biopsy and compared the efficiency of different methods and combinations for detecting cervical lesions. Results: HPV screening showed the highest sensitivity for identifying women with CIN2+ cervical lesions compared with other single methods. Our results also showed the importance and necessary of the secondary diagnostic test like TCT and TS as a triage method before colposcopy examination and guided biopsy. Conclusions: Our study provides recommendations for the optimal screening and detection strategies for cervical lesions in different regions with different levels of development. As a non-invasive, easily operated, and portable device, TS is a promising tool to replace TCT for detecting cervical lesions in the health care center with insufficient medical resources.