Abstract
Recent analyses of series of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients included in clinical trials have shown improved survival over time, but it has been impossible to determine whether this was due to selection biases, stage migration, or true therapeutic improvement. To determine if there has been a true improvement of survival over time, we reviewed the medical records of all consecutive patients diagnosed with SCLC between 1981 and 1994 in the Bas-Rhin in France. Among the 787 patients (median age 63), there was no significant period effect for sex, age, or stage. Staging work-ups became increasingly thorough (significant period effect). The mean number of investigations and of tumour sites detected correlated significantly. The chemotherapy rate increased (from 76.4% in 1981-1983 to 91.7% in 1993-1994, P = 10(-5)) and mediastinal irradiation decreased (to roughly 25% of patients after 1983). Median survival time increased for the overall population from 6.6 months in 1981-1983 to 11.3 months in 1993-1994 (P = 10(-5)), for patients with limited disease (LD) from 9.2 (P = 0.002) months to 14.0 months, and for those with extensive (ED) disease from 3.5 months to 9.6 months (P = 10(-5)). Significant independent prognostic factors were disease extent, clinical trial participation, period, type of chemotherapy, and mediastinal irradiation in LD. Survival time has truly improved as 'state of the art' management of SCLC has changed.