Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) with broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) is frequently performed in patients with hematological malignancies and pulmonary opacities. While the safety of the procedure in this patient population has been shown, data about the diagnostic yield widely differ between studies. Furthermore, data comparing diagnostic yield and safety of flexible bronchoscopy to narrow sources of pulmonary infections in patients with and without underlying hematological malignancy are lacking. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of bronchoscopies done for the diagnostic work-up of pulmonary infections. Diagnostic yield and the occurrence of complications in patients with and without hematological disease were compared. RESULTS: In total n=268 bronchoscopies were done in patients suffering from a hematological malignancy (HM) compared to n=408 bronchoscopies in patients without hematological malignancy (NHM). The overall diagnostic yield was similar and did not differ between the groups (HM: 67.2% vs. NHM: 64.7%; P=0.5622). However, when cultures positive for Candida were not considered as clinically relevant diagnostic yield was higher in the HM group (HM: 62.7% vs. NHM: 53.9%; P=0.0261) due to a higher detection rate of fungi and viruses (both P<0.001). Interestingly, the diagnostic yield for bacteria was not decreased by pre-treatment with antibiotics in either group (both P>0.05). There was no difference in the complication rate between the groups and most complications were considered as minor. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our data demonstrate similar diagnostic yield and safety of flexible bronchoscopy for diagnosing pulmonary infection in patients with and without underlying hematological malignancy.