Abstract
CAD/CAM-manufactured implants are increasingly becoming the standard in current therapy. The question of whether the manufacturing-related rougher surface of selective laser fusion plates compared to milled, smoother reconstruction plates leads to increased postoperative complications such as infections, plate exposure, and fistulas has not yet been determined. A retrospective analysis of 98 patients who underwent surgical treatment with either a selective laser fusion plate or a milled reconstruction plate at our hospital was performed. The only significant predictors of the revision risk were the operation time and use of antiresorptive medication. In the KLS Martin(®) group, the risk of revision decreased by approximately 20% for each additional hour by which the operation time was increased (OR = 0.81). In the Depuy Synthes(®) group, the risk of revision increased by approximately 11% with each additional hour of operative time (OR = 0.81 × 1.37 = 1.11). Both groups showed no significant differences in the number of necessary revision surgeries as well as inpatient complications. In summary, we can say that the assumption that additively manufactured reconstruction plates have a rougher surface due to selective laser melting and thus make plaque accumulation and revisions more likely has not been confirmed. Overall, it seems imperative to select further studies regarding the clinical outcome depending on the selected plate system.