Evaluation of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose broth for recovery of Clostridium difficile from environmental sites

评价环丝氨酸-头孢西丁-果糖琼脂和环丝氨酸-头孢西丁-果糖肉汤从环境场地回收艰难梭菌的效果

阅读:1

Abstract

Cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA) and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose broth (CCFB) containing either 500 or 250 micrograms of cycloserine per ml were compared for efficacy in the isolation of Clostridium difficile from hospital ward environmental sites. A RODAC imprint technique was used to inoculate prereduced CCFA. Moistened swabs were used to inoculate prereduced CCFB from environmental sites immediately adjacent to the RODAC sample sites. CCFA (6% positive) was significantly more sensitive than CCFB (3% positive; P less than 0.005), regardless of the cycloserine concentration. When the CCFA cycloserine concentration was decreased from 500 to 250 micrograms/ml, the overall rate of positive cultures rose from 4 to 17%. Medium containing 500 micrograms of cycloserine per ml may be too inhibitory to isolate many moderately sensitive strains of C. difficile from environmental sites. Regardless of the cycloserine concentration, the CCFA RODAC imprint technique is superior to the CCFB method.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。