Abstract
Acromioclavicular joint injury is common in young individuals who suffer direct trauma to the shoulder. Treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation is controversial with regards to the indication of operative management, timing of surgery, whether to perform open or arthroscopic surgery, method of stabilisation (rigid or non-rigid) and type of graft used for repair or reconstruction. Current evidence supports conservative management for Rockwood types I and II, while types IV, V and VI benefit from surgery. The optimal management of type III injuries in high demand patients remains contentious. Surgical options include acromioclavicular fixation, coracoclavicular fixation and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Few studies with a low level of evidence suggest arthroscopic techniques and anatomical ligament reconstruction have better outcomes when compared to older techniques of rigid coracoclavicular fixation. The aim of this article is to look at the current evidence and address these controversial issues.