Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report on the clinical outcome of patients undergoing combined arthroscopic treatment of labral resection and microfracture at the rim of acetabulum at a minimum 2-year follow-up. METHODS: The retrospective study included 38 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for irreparable labral injury from 24 February 2014 to 26 February 2018. Thirteen patients were excluded owing to patient refusal of participation and concomitant diseases like synovial chondromatosis and dysplasia hip. The study group consisted of patients undergoing combined arthroscopic labral resection and microfracture at the rim of acetabulum (MICRO Group: 20 patients), arthroscopic labral resection alone (RESEC Group: five patients). Postoperative three-dimensional (3D) double-echo steady-state (DESS) sequence with radial imaging at 3 Tesla were obtained and fluoroscopic image of the involved hip under distraction were used to observe the restoration of vacuum effect. Patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) including the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Visual Analogue Score (VAS), Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living Subscale (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS) were collected and compared between two groups. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for at least 6 months. The follow-up time of RESEC group is longer than MICRO group (46.6 months vs 23.9 months, P < 0.05). The 3D DESS imaging demonstrated intermediate signal intensity at the relative area where the labrum resected followed by microfracture at the acetabular rim in MICRO group. Meanwhile, regrowth of labrum-like tissue was not observed in MRI imaging of the RESEC group. Furthermore, vacuum effect was more apparent in MICRO group compared with RESEC group. All PROs in both groups showed a statistically significant improvement at follow-up compared with preoperative levels. RESEC group: HHS (73.0 vs 93.8, P < 0.05); HOS-ADL (51.5 vs 89.1, P < 0.05); HOS-SSS (47.8 vs 88.3, P < 0.05); VAS (6.4 vs 2.0, P < 0.05). MICRO group: HHS (70.5 vs 91.5, P < 0.05); HOS-ADL (52.4 vs 87.0, P < 0.05); HOS-SSS (48.1 vs 86.5, P < 0.05); VAS (6.3 vs 1.6, P < 0.05). One patient of MICRO group had transient neurapraxias of the pudendal nerve that resolved completely by 3 months. There showed no statistically significant difference between groups regarding the preoperative and postoperative PROs. CONCLUSION: Compared to labral resection, combined arthroscopic labral resection and microfracture at the rim of acetabulum is able to fulfill the labral defect area with the potential to restore the seal effect of labrum as an effective and safe option for irreparable segmental labral tears.