Abstract
Deployable medical systems(DEPMEDS) patient conditions (PCs) and Military Combat Injury Scale (MCIS) are 2 important military medical coding systems. However, both of them have defects when applied in military medical planning. Although each PC code contains information about treatment, intensity of care, treatment time, length of stay, and probability of disposition that is relevant to simulation, its description is too comprehensive and ambiguous to code historical military medical records. Therefore, conversion between PC and other medical coding systems applied in standard medical data is required when validity is required following simulation. The information linked to each PC code is based on subject matter expert opinion instead of standard medical data from the theater that need to be continuously updated depending on the results of medical data analysis. MCIS, a combat-related injury coding system, shows significant promise in coding real medical data, but it does not seek detailed information important for prediction and simulation unlike PCs. Therefore, MCIS cannot be used in planning tools directly. Thus, the effort to map MCIS to PCs is significant for medical logistic planning. We aim to identify whether conversion between PCs and MCIS is possible and to evaluate inter-coder reliability.Three senior coders assigned all possible MCIS codes to 187 combat-related PC codes. The data records were structured based on an earlier study. Inter-rater reliability was measured by using Cohen's k statistic and percent agreement.Low inter-rater reliability indicated the difficulty in conversion between PCs and MCIS.The injury descriptors of PCs should be expanded by referring to new standard medical data. The existing MCIS codes need to be modified to include more information on treatment brief, treatment time, length of stay, and other key information, and historical data statistics need to be developed.