Abstract
Increasing the use of plant proteins in foods requires improving their physical and chemical properties, such as emulsification, gelation capacity, and thermal stability. These properties determine the acceptability and functionality of food products. Higher protein solubility significantly impacts these properties by affecting denaturation and the stability of emulsifiers or gels. Therefore, developing plant-based protein ingredients requires accurately and conveniently measuring their solubility. Colorimetric solubility methods overcome many issues of more robust combustion and titration methods, but complicated chemical mechanisms limit their applicability for certain proteins. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of four common colorimetric solubility measurement methods for pulse and non-pulse legume proteins and hydrolysates. Pea, chickpea, lentil, and soy protein isolates were made from defatted flour and their solubility at a range of pHs was measured using the Bradford, Lowry, bicinchoninic acid (BCA), and biuret methods. Solubility was also measured for chickpea and soy protein hydrolysates made using Alcalase and Flavourzyme. A comparison of the methods for solubility quantification revealed that the Bradford and Lowry methods most closely match the expected results for the unhydrolyzed protein, with the BCA and biuret methods underestimating solubility by 30%. The Lowry method was the preferred method for hydrolysate solubility measurement, with the Bradford method measuring 0% solubility at the isoelectric point due to an inability to interact with peptides that are soluble at this pH. This study identifies reliable methods for measuring plant protein solubility that establish uniform outcomes and enable a better comparison across studies, giving a consensus for key functional properties in food applications.