Abstract
BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends one intramuscular (IM) vitamin K injection at birth to prevent Vitamin K Deficiency Bleeding of the Newborn (VKDB). Among factors associated with IM vitamin K refusal, investigators have reported an increased frequency of IM vitamin K refusal among parents who select midwife-assisted deliveries. Reasons behind this association are unclear. METHODS: To understand the perspectives of midwives on IM vitamin K prophylaxis and approach to counseling parents using qualitative methodology, we conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews of midwives associated with 3 tertiary academic medical centers and surrounding communities in Connecticut, Iowa and Michigan. We used the grounded theory approach and the constant comparative method until saturation was reached. RESULTS: We interviewed 19 white female midwives from different training pathways. Participants who were Certified Nurse Midwives (CNMs) routinely recommended IM vitamin K prophylaxis and Certified Professional Midwives (CPMs) took a more neutral approach. The following 4 themes emerged: (1) Emphasis on an educational approach to counseling that supports parents' decision-making authority; (2) Low-intervention philosophy in the midwifery model of care attracts certain parents; (3) Need for relationship building between midwives and pediatricians and (4) Opportunities for the future. CONCLUSIONS: Midwives in our study perceived that the midwifery model of care, the focus on physiologic birth and prioritizing parents' decision-making autonomy appears to attract a sub-set of expectant parents with certain belief systems who question interventions such as IM vitamin K prophylaxis. There are opportunities for better collaboration between midwives and pediatricians.