Abstract
BACKGROUND: Modern science has conquered seas, land, and space. Although great strides have been made in technology and infectious diseases, global surgery, which was reborn in 2015, has not made much progress. The burden of surgical disease in low- and middle-income countries remains seemingly unconquerable, and its growth unstoppable. The myriad challenges in meeting the surgical needs of 5 billion people has intrigued the author. METHODS: The author collected the views of plastic surgeons on sources and impediments to the scale-up of plastic surgery in low- and middle-income countries, as well as potential strategies for overcoming these obstacles. The author then performed a literature search reviewing the topics that arose from those discussions. The author proposes a strategy using plastic surgery as a model surgical discipline. RESULTS: A root-cause analysis suggests that the Alma Ata Declaration, with its focus on primary healthcare, is the probable genesis of global surgery (GS) woes. The absence of a clear GS community leader and the fragmented nature of GS advocates who operate in multiple silos, without a clear unified goal, are the primary reasons GS advocates have achieved so little on the ground. CONCLUSIONS: Global surgery requires a business model to sustainably meet the surgical needs of the 5 billion people globally. The proposed and implemented strategies must meet rigorous criteria to ensure sustainability, as quick-fix solutions are counterproductive. The development of centers of excellence offers a viable solution to problems that must be addressed successfully.