Ultrasound contrast agents affect the angiogenic response

超声造影剂会影响血管生成反应

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The interaction of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) and ultrasound (US) provides a way to spatially and temporally target tissues. Recently, UCAs have been used therapeutically to induce localized angiogenesis. Ultrasound contrast agents, however, have been documented to induce negative bioeffects. To further understand the balance of risks and benefits of UCAs and to examine the mechanism of US-UCA-induced angiogenesis, this study explored the role of UCAs, in particular Definity (Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc, North Billerica, MA), in producing an angiogenic response. METHODS: The gracilis muscles of Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to 1-MHz US. The rats were euthanized the same day or allowed to recover for 3 or 6 days post exposure (DPE). Ultrasound peak rarefactional pressures (P(r)s) of 0.25, 0.83, 1.4, and 2.0 MPa were used while rats were infused with either saline or Definity. Assessments for angiogenesis included capillary density, inflammation, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), both acutely (0 DPE) and at 3 and 6 DPE. RESULTS: The results of this study suggest that the angiogenic response is dependent on infusion media, P(r), and DPE. While capillary density did not reach significance, VEGF expression was significant for infusion media, P(r), and DPE with inflammation co-occurrence (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the angiogenic response is elicited by a mechanical effect of US-UCA stimulation of VEGF that is potentially optimized when collapse occurs.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。