Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee causes changes in knee alignment. A detailed knowledge of knee alignment is needed for correct assessment of the extent of disease progression, determination of treatment strategy, and confirmation of treatment effectiveness. However, deterioration of knee alignment during progression of OA has not been adequately characterized. The aims of this study were to clarify the changes in three-dimensional static knee alignment as knee OA stage progressed and to lay a foundation for an optimal treatment strategy to prevent knee malalignment. METHODS: A total of 106 knees of 81 patients ((men/women) 45/36; mean age 48.4 ± 19.9 years; body mass index (BMI) 25.7 ± 4.4 kg/m(2)) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study, comprising 34 (33/1) in Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 0, 17 (8/9) in KL grade 1, 26 (5/21) in KL grade 2, 19 (4/15) in KL grade 3, and 10 (1/9) in KL grade 4. In all cases, computed tomography images were obtained with the subject in a reclined and relaxed position with the knee straight. Three-dimensional bone models were created from the images and knee alignment was calculated with six degrees-of-freedom. Then, 40 knees were selected consisting of 10 sex- and BMI-matched knees from each KL grade group: KL grade 1 (mean age 54.6 ± 8.4 years; BMI 23.3 ± 3.5 kg/m(2)), grade 2 (64.7 ± 10.9 years; 27.3 ± 3.2 kg/m(2)), grade 3 (69.2 ± 11.4 years; 27.1 ± 4.3 kg/m(2)), and grade 4 (71.9 ± 9.2 years; 27.2 ± 3.6 kg/m(2)). The Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was used to analyze static alignment (α < 0.05/6). RESULTS: Alignment of the knee in flexion was -4.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): -6.4, -1.5] degrees, -3.4 [-8.0, 1.3] degrees, -0.1 [-3.7, 3.5] degrees, and 0.4 [-0.9, 1.6] degrees in the order of KL grade 1 to 4. There were significant differences between KL grade 1 and 4 (p = 0.0081). Anterior tibial translation was 6.6 [4.6, 8.6] mm, 5.8 [1.9, 9.7] mm, 1.0 [-2.5, 4.5] mm, and 1.3 [-2.4, 5.1] mm in the order of grade 1 to 4. There were significant differences between KL grade 1 and 4 (p = 0.0081). There were no significant differences in lateral tibial translation nor tibial rotation. CONCLUSIONS: The severely osteoarthritic knee joint was flexed and the tibia was displaced posteriorly with respect to the femur. Preventing these changes in alignment would assist in the prevention and treatment of knee OA.