Background
Sciatic nerve repair becomes a focus of research in neurological aspect to restore the normal physical ability of the animal to stand and walk. Tissue engineered nerve grafts (TENGs) provide a promising alternative therapy for regeneration of large gap defects. The present study investigates the regenerative capacity of PRP, ADSCs, and PRP mixed ADSCs on a long sciatic nerve defect (40-mm) bridged by a polyglycolic polypropylene (PGA-PRL) mesh which acts as a neural scaffold. Materials and
Conclusion
ADSCs have a great role in restoring the damaged nerve fibers by secreting several types of growth factors like NGF that have a proliferative effect on Schwann cells and their migration. In addition, PRP therapy potentiates the effect of ADSCs by synthesis another growth factors such as PDGF-A, VEGF, NGF for better healing of large sciatic gap defects.
Methods
The study was conducted on 12 adult male mongrel dogs that were randomly divided into 4 groups: Group I (scaffold group); where the sciatic defect was bridged by a (PGA-PRL) mesh only while the mesh was injected with ADSCs in Group II (ADSCs group), PRP in Group III (PRP group). Mixture of PRP and ADSCs was allocated in Group IV (PRP + ADSCs group). Monthly, all animals were monitored for improvement in their gait and a numerical lameness score was recorded for all groups. 6 months-post surgery, the structural and functional recovery of sciatic nerve was evaluated electrophysiologically, and on the level of gene expression, and both sciatic nerve and the gastrocnemius muscle were evaluated morphometrically, histopathologically.
Results
Numerical lameness score showed improvement in the motor activities of both Group II and Group III followed by Group IV and the scaffold group showed mild improvement even after 6 months. Histopathologically, all treated groups showed axonal sprouting and numerous regenerated fascicles with obvious angiogenesis in proximal cut, and distal portion where Group IV exhibited a significant remyelination with the MCOOL technique. The regenerative ratio of gastrocnemius muscle was 23.81%, 56.68%, 52.06% and 40.69% for Group I, II, III and IV; respectively. The expression of NGF showed significant up regulation in the proximal portion for both Group III and Group IV (P ≤ 0.0001) while Group II showed no significant difference. PDGF-A, and VEGF expressions were up-regulated in Group II, III, and IV whereas Group I showed significant down-regulation for NGF, PDGF-A, and VEGF (P ≤ 0.0001).