Abstract
Background and Objectives: Hysterectomy is a common non-obstetric procedure. Minimally invasive techniques, such as laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgery, have replaced open surgery for benign gynecologic conditions. Robotic surgery offers reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays but is limited by high costs. Articulating laparoscopic instruments aim to replicate robotic dexterity cost-effectively. However, comparative data on these two approaches in hysterectomy are limited. Materials and Methods: This multicenter study analyzed the outcomes of hysterectomies for benign gynecological diseases using articulating laparoscopic instruments (prospectively recruited) and robot-assisted surgery (retrospectively reviewed). The surgeries were performed by minimally invasive gynecological surgeons in South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. The baseline characteristics, operative details, and outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, complications, and hospital stay, were compared. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 151 patients were analyzed, including 67 in the articulating laparoscopy group and 84 in the robot-assisted group. The operating times were comparable (114.9 vs. 119.9 min, p = 0.22). The articulating group primarily underwent dual-port surgery (79.1%), whereas the robot-assisted group required four or more ports in 71.4% of the cases (p < 0.001). Postoperative complications occurred in both groups, without a significant difference (9.0% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.17). No severe complications or significant differences in the 30-day readmission rates were observed. Conclusions: Articulating laparoscopic instruments provide outcomes comparable to robot-assisted surgery in hysterectomy while reducing the number of ports required. Further studies are needed to explore the learning curve and long-term impact on surgical outcomes.