Is Thrombectomy Worth It for Isolated Posterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion? Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

对于孤立性后大脑动脉闭塞,血栓切除术是否值得?荟萃分析和试验序贯分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thrombectomy is well-established management for acute ischemic stroke involving large vessel occlusion. However. the potential efficacy of thrombectomy for isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion remains limited. The study aims to evaluate the benefits of thrombectomy for isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase for articles published until September 2023. The primary outcome was good functional outcome at 3 months. The secondary outcomes included excellent functional outcome at 3 months and early neurological improvement. The safety outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and mortality at 3 months. RESULTS: Seven retrospective studies involving 2560 patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion were included (876 patients receiving thrombectomy). The odds ratio (OR) of good functional outcome at 3 months was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.68-1.28) between 2 groups. The OR of excellent functional outcome (OR 1.23; 95% CI 0.92-1.64) and early neurological improvement (OR 1.82; 95% CI 0.97-3.40) were not different between the 2 groups. Compared with patients with best medical management, those with thrombectomy demonstrated a significantly increased risk of mortality (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.24-2.65), whereas the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 2.033; 95% CI 0.996-4.148) did not show an increase. Additionally, the results of trial sequential analysis indicated all outcomes were inconclusive. CONCLUSION: Thrombectomy stands as an available procedure for patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion; however, it shows no notable benefits in reducing symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage risk or enhancing function and may raise mortality compared with standard medical management. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to yield more conclusive evidence.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。