Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine whether an elimination diet with virtually provided functional medicine health coaching support would be more effective than a typical self-guided elimination diet with respect to dietary compliance and patient-reported health and quality of life. METHODS: A parallel arm, randomized controlled trial was conducted among a sample of healthcare professionals. Participants were randomized to either an elimination diet with 5 sessions of functional medicine health coaching support (intervention arm) or a self-guided elimination diet (control arm). Outcomes assessed at baseline and at the conclusion of the 10-week study included PROMIS Global Health (GH) and medical symptoms questionnaire (MSQ). Compliance with the elimination diet was assessed at the conclusion of the study. Baseline and end of study outcomes were compared within study arms via paired t tests and between study arms with unpaired t tests. Subgroup analysis of symptomatology at baseline was performed. RESULTS: 125 randomized participants (n = 64 intervention, n = 61 control) provided baseline outcomes data. There were statistically and clinically significant within-group improvements in patient-reported outcomes in both the intervention arm (PROMIS GH-physical = 4.68, PROMIS GH-mental = 3.53, MSQ = 28.9) and control arm (PROMIS GH-physical = 48.4, PROMIS GH-mental = 3.18, MSQ = 24.1). There were no between-group differences in the primary analysis (P > .1). However, participants with more symptoms at baseline had statistically and clinically significant between-group differences in PROMIS GH-mental health (3.90, P = .0038) and MSQ (12.3, P = .047) scores that favored the functional medicine health coaching arm. CONCLUSIONS: An elimination diet, whether self-guided or with functional medicine health coaching support, may improve patient-reported health outcomes among relatively healthy healthcare professionals. While studies in more diverse samples are needed, functional medicine health coaching support appears to be superior to a self-guided approach with regard to both dietary compliance and improving health outcomes among those with greater symptomatology.