Global sagittal alignment of the spine, pelvis, lower limb after vertebral compression fracture and its effect on quality of life

椎体压缩性骨折后脊柱、骨盆、下肢整体矢状位排列及其对生活质量的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are the most common among all osteoporotic fractures. The body may compensate to the kyphosis from vertebral compression fractures with lordosis of the adjacent spinal segments, rotation of the pelvis, knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion. However, the detailed degree of body compensation, especially the lower limb, remains uncertain. Herein, the aim of this study is to investigate the values of global sagittal alignments (GSA) parameters, including the spine, pelvis and lower limbs, in patients with and without VCFs, as well as to evaluate the effect of VCFs on various quality of life (QoL) parameters. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2015 to June 2018. A total of 142 patients with VCFs aged over 60 years old and 108 age-matched asymptomatic controls were recruited. Whole body sagittal alignment including thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1-pelvic angle (TPA), knee-flex angle (KA) and ankle-flex angle (AA) were measured. In addition, lower back pain and quality of life were assessed using self-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: Compared to asymptomatic controls, patients with VCF showed significantly greater TK (33.4(o) ± 16.4(o) vs 28.4(o) ± 11.4(o); p < 0.01), PT (25.4(o) ± 10.5(o) vs 16.6(o) ± 8.9(o); p < 0.001), PI (54.6(o) ± 11.8(o) vs 45.8(o) ± 12.0(o); p < 0.001), SVA (49.1 mm ± 39.6 mm vs 31.5 mm ± 29.3 mm; p < 0.01), and TPA (28.6(o) ± 10.8(o) vs 14.8(o) ± 8.6(o); p < 0.001). Whereas for lower limb alignment, patients with VCF showed significantly higher KA (10.1(o) ± 7.8(o) vs 6.0(o) ± 6.4(o); p < 0.001) and AA (7.0(o) ± 3.9(o) vs 4.8(o) ± 3.6(o); p < 0.001) than controls. The number of VCF significantly correlated with lower limb alignments (KA and AA) and global sagittal balance (TPA). VCF patients showed poorer quality of life assessment scores in terms of SF-12 (30.0 ± 8.3 vs 72.4 ± 16.9; p < 0.001), ODI (37.8 ± 24.0 vs 18.7 ± 16.6; p < 0.001) and VAS (3.8 ± 2.8 vs 1.9 ± 2.2; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to illustrate the abnormal lower limb alignment exhibited in patients with VCF. Patients with VCF showed an overall worse global sagittal alignment and decreased quality of life. Poorer global sagittal alignment of VCF patients also imply worse quality of life and more severe VCF.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。