Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the process of public involvement in planning primary health care. BACKGROUND: Recent policy in the UK promotes public involvement in planning health but there have been difficulties in engaging communities in the process. Surveys of health service organizations have found that there has been a failure to adapt to new approaches. It has become important to understand why this has occurred if policy initiatives to encourage involvement are to succeed. DESIGN: Qualitative study. Data collected through individual interviews and focus groups. SETTING: Two new primary healthcare developments in deprived areas in Bristol and Weston-Super-Mare. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six professionals and 23 local residents in Bristol; six professionals and three local residents in Weston-Super-Mare. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: process, partnership and power. The main findings were that exceptional people with a shared commitment to public involvement were necessary to motivate others and develop partnerships. Local people were drawn into the process and with increased confidence became powerful advocates for their community. Creative and varied methods to involve the public were important in achieving balance between professionals and lay people. However, conflicts over practical decisions arose from a lack of clarity over who had power to influence decisions. CONCLUSION: Most of the participants were enthusiastic about their experience of public involvement in planning primary health care. Features crucial to sustainable involvement included a commitment from leaders within statutory agencies, support over a long period to build the confidence of local people, willingness to use informal approaches that are in tune with local culture, and a recognition of the concerns of both service users and providers.