Rationale of family medicine physicians in effectively identifying patients with chronic hyperglycemia through point-of-care hemoglobin A1C screenings

家庭医生通过床旁糖化血红蛋白A1C筛查有效识别慢性高血糖患者的理论依据

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many patients are unknowingly living with chronic hyperglycemia, possibly due to low screening rates. We aimed to correlate detection of unidentified chronic hyperglycemia to practitioner reported rationale for conducting diabetes screening. METHODS: Physicians screened patients via a point-of-care A1C tests and recorded corresponding rationales. Elevated outcomes (A1C ≥ 5.7%) were correlated to recorded rationales, frequency of repeat screenings, documented diagnoses, and therapeutic actions taken as a result of elevated A1C. RESULTS: Nearly one-half (45%) of selected patients were unknowingly living with chronic hyperglycemia, having an average A1C of 7.92% for outcomes ≥6.5%. Most commonly recorded rationales were overweight status (71%), high-risk ethnicity (58%), and age > 45 years (48%); previously recorded A1C result of ≥5.7% (χ(2) 16.02, p < 0.001) and hypertension diagnosis (χ(2) 10.37, p = 0.0013) showed statistically significant correlation with elevated A1C outcomes. A1C results ≥6.5% versus 5.7-6.5% more frequently prompted repeat screenings (77% vs 20%), ICD-10 code documentation (91% vs 28%), lifestyle modification recommendations (78% vs 35%), and drug therapy initiation (78% vs 9%). CONCLUSIONS: Reported rationales were largely impacted by visual inspections of age, race, and weight, and prediabetic A1C values garnered less attention compared to higher values. Utilization of POC A1C screening followed by conformational repeat testing is a practical approach to improve diagnostic rates and initiation of care for diabetes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。