Abstract
Every brain is unique, having its structural and functional organization shaped by both genetic and environmental factors over the course of its development. Brain image studies tend to produce results by averaging across a group of subjects, under the common assumption that it is possible to subdivide the cortex into homogeneous areas while maintaining a correspondence across subjects. We investigate this assumption: can the structural properties of a specific region of an atlas be assumed to be the same across subjects? This question is addressed by looking at the network representation of the brain, with nodes corresponding to brain regions and edges to their structural relationships. Using an unsupervised graph matching strategy, we align the structural connectomes of a set of healthy subjects, considering parcellations of different granularity, to understand the connectivity misalignment between regions. First, we compare the obtained permutations with four different algorithm initializations: Spatial Adjacency, Identity, Barycenter, and Random. Our results suggest that applying an alignment strategy improves the similarity across subjects when the number of parcels is above 100 and when using Spatial Adjacency and Identity initialization (the most plausible priors). Second, we characterize the obtained permutations, revealing that the majority of permutations happens between neighbors parcels. Lastly, we study the spatial distribution of the permutations. By visualizing the results on the cortex, we observe no clear spatial patterns on the permutations and all the regions across the context are mostly permuted with first and second order neighbors.