Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Preprocedural identification of the Adamkiewicz artery is crucial in patients with aortic diseases. This study aimed to compare 70-kV CTA with conventional 120-kV CTA for the identification of the Adamkiewicz artery, examining differences in radiation dose and image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 2 equal groups of 60 patients who had undergone 70-kV or 120-kV CTA to detect the Adamkiewicz artery before aortic repair. Size-specific dose estimate, the CT number of the aorta, and the contrast-to-noise ratio of the anterior spinal artery to the spinal cord were recorded. Furthermore, detectability of the Adamkiewicz artery was evaluated by using a 4-point continuity score (3, definite to 0, undetectable). RESULTS: There was significantly lower radiation exposure with 70-kV CTA than 120-kV CTA (median size-specific dose estimate, 23.1 versus 61.3 mGy, respectively; P < .001). CT number and contrast-to-noise ratio were both significantly higher in the 70-kV CTA group than the 120-kV group (999.1 HU compared with 508.7 HU, and 5.6 compared with 3.4, respectively; P < .001 for both). Detectability of the Adamkiewicz artery was not impaired in the 70-kV CTA group (90.0% versus 83.3% in the 120-kV group, P = .28). Moreover, the Adamkiewicz artery was detected with greater confidence with 70-kV CTA, reflected by a significantly superior continuity score (median, 3) compared with 120-kV CTA (median, 2; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Seventy-kilovolt CTA has substantial advantages for the identification of the Adamkiewicz artery before aortic repair, with a significantly lower radiation exposure and superior image quality than 120-kV CTA.