Head-to-Head Evaluation of (18)F-FES and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Metastatic Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer

转移性浸润性小叶乳腺癌中 (18)F-FES 和 (18)F-FDG PET/CT 的直接比较

阅读:1

Abstract

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) demonstrates lower conspicuity on (18)F-FDG PET than the more common invasive ductal carcinoma. Other molecular imaging methods may be needed for evaluation of this malignancy. As ILC is nearly always (95%) estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, ER-targeting PET tracers such as 16α-(18)F-fluoroestradiol ((18)F-FES) may have value. We reviewed prospective trials at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center using (18)F-FES PET/CT to evaluate metastatic ILC patients with synchronous (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FES PET/CT imaging, which allowed a head-to-head comparison of these 2 PET tracers. Methods: Six prospective clinical trials using (18)F-FES PET/CT in patients with metastatic breast cancer were performed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2008 to 2019. These trials included 92 patients, of whom 14 (15%) were of ILC histology. Seven of 14 patients with ILC had (18)F-FDG PET/CT performed within 5 wk of the research (18)F-FES PET/CT and no intervening change in management. For these 7 patients, the (18)F-FES and (18)F-FDG PET/CT studies were analyzed to determine the total number of tracer-avid lesions, organ systems of involvement, and SUV(max) of each organ system for both tracers. Results: In the 7 comparable pairs of scans, there were a total of 254 (18)F-FES-avid lesions (SUV(max), 2.6-17.9) and 111 (18)F-FDG-avid lesions (SUV(max), 3.3-9.9) suggestive of malignancy. For 5 of 7 (71%) ILC patients, (18)F-FES PET/CT detected more metastatic lesions than (18)F-FDG PET/CT. In the same 5 of 7 patients, the SUV(max) of (18)F-FES-avid lesions was greater than the SUV(max) of (18)F-FDG-avid lesions. One patient had (18)F-FES-avid metastases with no corresponding (18)F-FDG-avid metastases. There were no patients with (18)F-FDG-avid distant metastases without (18)F-FES-avid distant metastases, although in one patient liver metastases were evident on (18)F-FDG but not on (18)F-FES PET. Conclusion:(18)F-FES PET/CT compared favorably with (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detection of metastases in patients with metastatic ILC. Larger prospective trials of (18)F-FES PET/CT in ILC should be considered to evaluate ER-targeted imaging for clinical value in patients with this histology of breast cancer.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。