Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Several techniques have evolved over time to monitor depth of anesthesia and ensure enhanced recovery. This randomized double-blinded trial was designed to compare bispectral index (BIS) or end-tidal anaesthetic concentration (ETAC) monitoring on the recovery characteristics of patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgeries. METHODS: Seventy American Society of Anesthesiologist I-II patients of either sex were randomized to Group B - BIS-guided protocol, Group E - ETAC-guided protocol, or Group S - Standard protocol. After intravenous induction, anaesthesia was maintained with desflurane in O(2)/N(2)O (50:50) mixture. In BIS, ETAC and Standard groups, inspired end-tidal desflurane concentration was varied to achieve BIS of 45-55, 0.8-1.0 age-corrected minimum alveolar concentration, and haemodynamic parameters within 20% of the baseline, respectively. Time to eye opening (emergence time, the primary outcome), time to extubation, and time to name recall from the discontinuation of the anaesthetic agent were recorded. Incidence of nausea, vomiting, and total analgesic consumption was noted for 24 h. RESULTS: Emergence time (mean ± SD) in ETAC (5.1 ± 1.53 min) and BIS (5.0 ± 2.12 min)-guided groups was significantly lower than Standard group (7.5 ± 2.90 min). Extubation time in ETAC (6.3 ± 2.22 min) and BIS-guided group (6.5 ± 1.78 min) was significantly lower than Standard group (9.0 ± 3.20 min) (P < 0.001). Time to achieve fast track score of more than 12 was significantly less in BIS-guided group (13.12 ± 2.59 min). CONCLUSION: ETAC-guided anaesthesia is comparable to BIS-guided anaesthesia in achieving early recovery.