Abstract
Several commercially available quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) systems enable highly sensitive detection of human DNA and provide a degradation index (DI) to assess DNA quality. From routine casework in forensic genetics, it was observed that DNA degradation in forensic samples such as blood samples stored under sub-optimal conditions leads to visible effects in multiplex analyses of short tandem repeat markers (STRs) due to decreased amplification efficiencies in longer amplicons. It was further noticed that degradation indices often remain below the value that is considered to be critical. Thus, the aim of this work was to systematically analyze this effect and to compare conventional qPCR assays with a modified qPCR approach using uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) and DNA quality assessment methods based on electrophoresis. Blood samples were stored at three different storage temperatures for up to 316 days. Significantly increased DNA recovery was observed from samples stored at high temperatures (37 °C) compared samples stored at room temperature and 4 °C. We observed typical effects of degradation in STR analyses but no correlation between DI and storage time in any of the storage conditions. Adding UNG slightly increased the sensitivity of detecting DNA degradation in one of the qPCR kits used in this study. This observation was not confirmed when using a second qPCR system. Electrophoretic systems did also not reveal significant correlations between integrity values and time. Methods for detecting DNA degradation are usually limited to the detection of DNA fragmentation, and we conclude that degradation affecting forensic STR typing is more complex.