Abstract
BACKGROUND: Posterior malleolar fractures are found in almost 50% of all ankle fractures. The high clinical relevance of these joint fractures is explained by the significantly worse clinical and functional outcome. There is still a lack of unified opinion regarding the classification and treatment of these fractures. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to provide a systematic literature review of clinical studies that investigated posterior malleolar fractures and classified them using one of the three established classifications according to Haraguchi, Bartonicek/Rammelt, or Mason. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed was searched without time limits. The systematic literature search was performed according to the current criteria of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The methodological quality of the included studies was quantified using the modified Coleman score. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies with a total of 2220 patients were included in this systematic literature review. Trimalleolar fractures showed a significantly less favorable prognosis than other ankle fractures. The quality of reduction was the most important prognostic factor for the clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: None of the three classifications examined has become established in the literature. Most of the classifications are weak or should not be used with respect to a derivable treatment algorithm or a prognosis with respect to the outcome. Only the classification according to Bartonicek/Rammelt is suitable to become established in the literature and in clinical practice due to its derivable treatment algorithm.