Abstract
For refractory chronic hepatitis C, interferon (IFN)-based triple-agent combination therapy with second-generation direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has been established as the standard treatment method. The rate of decrease in the viral load and the negative conversion of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in the early phase following treatment initiation are considered important factors for predicting the therapeutic outcome. In the present study, the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan (CAP/CTM) HCV v2.0 assay and the AccuGENE m-HCV RNA quantitative assay [Abbott RealTime HCV (ART) assay] were analyzed for their clinical efficacy and ability to predict therapeutic outcomes in the early phase in patients with relapse following IFN-based second-generation DAA therapy. Of the 56 patients who received IFN-based second-generation DAA therapy since December 2013, 6 achieved an end-of-treatment response (ETR), but subsequently experienced relapse. In these 6 patients, fluctuations in viral loads in the early phase detected by the CAP/CTM and ART assays were compared. At 4 weeks after treatment initiation, 4 of the 6 patients were diagnosed as negative by the CAP/CTM assay, whereas 2 of these 4 patients were not identified as negative by the ART assay. Of the 2 patients, one was signal-positive with an HCV RNA load <1.08 Log IU/ml, and the other patient had a viral load of 1.12 Log IU/ml. At 8 weeks after treatment initiation, 1 patient was found to be negative by the CAP/CTM assay, but signal-positive with a viral load <1.08 Log IU/ml by the ART assay. From 4 to 8 weeks after treatment initiation, 3 of the 6 patients appeared to be discrepant cases. In conclusion, of the 6 patients who achieved an ETR, 4 were determined to have achieved a rapid virological response (RVR) by the CAP/CTM assay, but may not have actually become negative. The ART assay is highly sensitive, has a wide measurement range, may be suitable for monitoring HCV RNA loads, and is expected to have an important role in providing a predictive marker for early therapeutic outcomes. In discrepant cases in which no RVR is proved by either assay, it was assumed important to consider continuation of treatment and to attempt to achieve a sustained virological response.