Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the lung structure of small airway dysfunction (SAD) defined by spirometry and parametric response mapping (PRM) using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and to analyze the predictive factors for SAD. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted with 388 participants undergoing pulmonary function test (PFT) and inspiratory-expiratory chest CT scans. The clinical data and HRCT assessments of SAD patients defined by both methods were compared. A prediction model for SAD was constructed based on logistic regression. RESULTS: SAD was defined in 122 individuals by spirometry and 158 by PRM. In HRCT visual assessment, emphysema, tree-in-bud sign, and bronchial wall thickening have higher incidence in SAD defined by each method. (p < 0.001). Quantitative CT showed that spirometry-SAD had thicker airway walls (p < 0.001), smaller lumens (p = 0.011), fewer bronchi (p < 0.001), while PRM-SAD had slender blood vessels. Predictive factors for spirometry-SAD were age, male gender, the volume percentage of emphysema in PRM (PRM(Emph)), tree-in-bud sign, bronchial wall thickening, bronchial count; for PRM-SAD were age, male gender, BMI, tree-in-bud sign, emphysema, the percentage of blood vessel volume with a cross-sectional area less than 1 mm(2) (BV1/TBV). The area under curve (AUC) values for the fitted predictive models were 0.855 and 0.808 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PRM, SAD defined by spirometry is more closely related to airway morphology, while PRM is sensitive to early pulmonary dysfunction but may be interfered by pulmonary vessels. Models combining patient information and HRCT assessment have good predictive value for SAD. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: HRCT reveals lung structural differences in small airway dysfunction defined by spirometry and parametric response mapping. This insight aids in understanding methodological differences and developing radiological tools for small airways that align with pathophysiology. KEY POINTS: Spirometry-SAD shows thickened airway walls, narrowed lumen, and reduced branch count, which are closely related to airway morphology. PRM shows good sensitivity to early pulmonary dysfunction, although its assessment of SAD based on gas trapping may be affected by the density of pulmonary vessels and other lung structures. Combining patient information and HRCT features, the fitted model has good predictive performance for SAD defined by both spirometry and PRM (AUC values are 0.855 and 0.808, respectively).