Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Differential diagnosis of dyspnea is vital for the management of respiratory failure, where routine parameters can now be integrated with thoracic ultrasound data. The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity and accuracy of this approach in a department of internal medicine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 152 patients consecutively hospitalized with a diagnosis of dyspnea. After clinical evaluation, chest radiography, biochemical assays (NT-proBNP), and emergency treatment, patients underwent ultrasound examination of the lungs. Results were considered positive if the total number of lines B was higher than 8. The ultrasound examination and NT-proBNP assay were repeated after 48 h. The gold standard was the clinical diagnosis of heart failure made by medical experts in accordance with AHA guidelines. RESULTS: The group of patients with positive ultrasound findings had a higher frequency of heart failure diagnoses (X(2) 92.5, p < 0.005) and significantly higher values of NT-proBNP (10,384 ng/l vs 3889 ng/l, p < 0.05). Moreover, the decrease in the number of B lines at 48 h was significantly greater (p < 0.005) among patients treated for heart failure. There were no significant changes in the values of NT-proBNP (p = 0.37). DISCUSSION: In conclusion we have shown that even in a department of internal medicine, lung ultrasonography is a useful tool for diagnosing respiratory insufficiency and monitoring its response to therapy.