Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hamstring length plays a significant role in a spectrum of clinical entities, from injury prevention and gait dysfunction to posture correction. Evidence suggests that the prevalence of hamstring tightness (HT)/reduced length is increasing. Despite the number of available tests and treatment protocols, HT is still a functional diagnosis. This study's primary goal is to evaluate concurrent muscle (CM) usage during these testing procedures to design a unique, customized treatment protocol. METHODS: The study was conducted in two stages. In phase 1, Active Straight Leg Raise (ASLR), Active Total Knee Extension (ATKE), and Active Seated Total Knee Extension (ASTKE) were carried out. Next, two pressure gauges (PGs) were placed to align with the natural lumbar and cervical curvatures while testing ASLR and ATKE. After analyzing the results for pressure gauge placement, phase 2 data were collected for tests ASLR and ATKE with PG. RESULTS: The results of ASLR and ATKE, both with and without PG, indicate a high prevalence rate, whereas the results of ASTKE show no prevalence. Changes in the PG values indicate CM usage. Dichotomization revealed that participants with normal test scores (non-HT group) had increased usage of CM work. Positive and negative changes in PG indicate the involved CM group. CONCLUSION(S): In regular practice, most healthcare professionals and fitness trainers prefer ASTKE due to the ease of the testing procedure. Directing co-professionals on their choice of tests is challenging, whereas providing knowledge about CM use paves the way for creating customized treatment plans.