Conclusion
First, we confirmed the reactivation of COVID-19 in a child. The risk of recurrent infection with SARS-CoV-2 was low, and the policy of strictly isolating patients carrying long-term viral ribonucleic acid should be reconsidered. The interval positivity was most likely due to incorrect sampling and/or testing methods. SGS and aB testing are recommended for children with viral reactivation. Second, SARS-CoV-2 viral reactivation cannot be ruled out. The possible mechanisms, such as prolonged infection and viral latent reactivation, need further investigation.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical manifestations, epidemiological data, laboratory and imaging examinations, treatment, and follow-up of the child. And then, we searched related literature using PubMed.
Objective
To investigate the case of a child infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who had subsequent viral reactivation.
Results
The 9-year-old boy was exposed to COVID-19 in Malawi and tested positive for NAT in Haikou, China. He was asymptomatic and admitted to our hospital. After six negative NATs, he was discharged from the hospital and quarantined in a hotel. His infection was reactivated again after 22 days (interval between first and last positive NATs). The cycle threshold (Ct) values of positive tests were 25 and 31, and the gene sequencing viral loads were very low. The viral strain Kenya/P2601/2020, a variant of the hCoV-19/Wuhan/IVDC-HB-01/2019 genome (GISAID accession IL: EPI_ISL_402119), was found when polymerase chain reaction enrichment was used to sequence the virus. However, people around him tested negative for COVID-19.