Abstract
BACKGROUND: A complex array of legislation, regulation, policies and aspirational statements by governments, statutory agencies and pharmacy organisations constitutes the policy environment that influences Australian community pharmacy, including pharmacists' performance. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the relevance of the policy environment to Australian community pharmacists' performance by examining stakeholders' perspectives on their professionalism and standards. METHODS: Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken on 38 semi-structured interviews of purposively selected individuals including pharmacists and other key stakeholders, from 4 socio-ecological strata (societal, community, organisational, and individual) that have influence on the person to person interaction that a consumer may have with a pharmacist in a community pharmacy. RESULTS: As indicators of their performance, pharmacists' professionalism and compliance with standards can no longer be assumed; they must be demonstrated. However, the current dispensing funding model compromises their ability to demonstrate professionalism and policy is lacking in relation to monitoring and rewarding standards. These shortcomings are further compromised by a growth in commercialism in community pharmacy which impacts the delivery of professional services. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study have implications for pharmacy as an autonomously regulated profession in Australia. Dispensing funding policy could better support and reward quality in pharmacists' performance, and there is strong support for compulsory monitoring of standards. Compliance with a nation-wide quality framework, and provision of a minimum set of professional services should be an obligatory requirement of all community pharmacies.