Ventricular assist device therapy in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: historical outcomes and current trends

心脏手术后心源性休克的心室辅助装置治疗:历史结果和当前趋势

阅读:2

Abstract

Ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy has been used successfully as a bridge to recovery, bridge to transplant and in the last decade as a destination therapy. The use of VAD for post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) is not currently reported in national databases in the UK and Ireland. Data were collected through a telephone survey of chief perfusionists from all the cardiac surgery units in the UK and Ireland between October 2007 and October 2008. Approximately 28 000 adult cardiac surgical procedures were performed at 45 cardiac centres, of which 33 (73%) reported using VAD. The total number of patients supported was 66, of which 41% (n = 27) survived to be discharged home. About 42.5% (n = 28) died during VAD in place, and 16.5% died after successful weaning from VAD. Preferences for device types were Biomedicus (n = 25), Levitronix (n = 10), Sorin (n = 3), roller pump (n = 3) and Berlin heart (n = 2). Despite the reasonable survival rates after VAD use in post-cardiotomy heart failure, there are significant differences in their availability and individual's attitude towards their use. VAD use in PCCS should be prospectively documented in the audit returns of all the units, for further analysis and for generation of protocols.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。