Discussion
Despite the proximity of aSyn and IAPP in β-cells and the detected capacity of preformed aSyn fibrils to seed IAPP in vitro, it is still an open question if an interaction between the two molecules is of pathogenic significance for type 2 diabetes.
Material and methods
The antibody-based detection techniques, proximity ligation assay (PLA), and immuno-TEM were used for co-localization studies. Bifluorescence complementation (BiFC) was used for interaction studies between IAPP and aSyn in HEK 293 cells. The Thioflavin T assay was used for studies of cross-seeding between IAPP and aSyn. ASyn was downregulated with siRNA, and insulin secretion was monitored using TIRF microscopy.
Methods
The antibody-based detection techniques, proximity ligation assay (PLA), and immuno-TEM were used for co-localization studies. Bifluorescence complementation (BiFC) was used for interaction studies between IAPP and aSyn in HEK 293 cells. The Thioflavin T assay was used for studies of cross-seeding between IAPP and aSyn. ASyn was downregulated with siRNA, and insulin secretion was monitored using TIRF microscopy.
Results
We demonstrate intracellular co-localization of aSyn with IAPP, while aSyn is absent in the extracellular amyloid deposits. ASyn reactivity is present in the secretory granules of β-cells and some α-cells in human islets. The BiFC-expression of aSyn/aSyn and IAPP/IAPP in HEK293 cells resulted in 29.3% and 19.7% fluorescent cells, respectively, while aSyn/IAPP co-expression resulted in ∼10% fluorescent cells. Preformed aSyn fibrils seeded IAPP fibril formation in vitro, but adding preformed IAPP seeds to aSyn did not change aSyn fibrillation. In addition, mixing monomeric aSyn with monomeric IAPP did not affect IAPP fibril formation. Finally, the knockdown of endogenous aSyn did not affect β cell function or viability, nor did overexpression of aSyn affect β cell viability.