Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Dynamic navigation (DN), a computer-assisted technique integrating CBCT data and real-time video, has emerged as a promising approach to place implants in the recent years. This study aims to evaluate the consistency and ease of use of a dynamic navigation system for implant placement by comparing the accuracy in single and adjacent implant placements and workability achieved by three different operators. METHODS: This study included Forty-eight patients requiring dental implants, total of sixty implants were randomly assigned to 3 operators of varying experiences, the implants were planned and placed under DN. The accuracy of implant placement were measured in terms of mesio-distal, apico-coronal displacement and angulations using Evalunav application (Navident, Claronav, Canada). Secondary outcome variables are the number of errors encountered during the procedure and the time taken for the procedure by different practitioners. Kruskal Wallis Test followed by the Post hoc Mann Whitney U test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the accuracy of single implants (P > 0.05). For adjacent implants (T1), the displacement in mesiodistal direction was significantly different (P = 0.003) and also for apico-coronal position of T1-abutment group when compared to controls with a P value of 0.026. Experienced surgeons had the highest error rates as well and longest time (18.27 ± 5.62 versus 15 min). CONCLUSIONS: The operating surgeon do not determine the accuracy rather the navigation system comes with a steep learning curve that needs to be acquired prior to practicing the same.