Abstract
BACKGROUND: The indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) utilizing antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) is widely used as a diagnostic test for autoimmune vasculitis. The presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) might lead to a misleading interpretation of ANCA. This study aims to explore the impact of the presence of ANA on the interpretation of ANCA. METHODS: This retrospective research examined samples negative for antiMPO and antiPR3 ANCA by IIFA and explored correlations between the ANA-IIFA results and the ANCA interpretation frequencies. Our analysis involved the use of suitable statistical methods, including Chi-square and kappa statistics. RESULTS: Up to 75.2% of the ANCA-IIFA-positive samples exhibited a positive p-ANCA pattern when using the ethanol-fixed substrate, with c-ANCA positivity at 24.8%. In the ANA-IIFA-positive samples, ~77.3% displayed p-ANCA patterns on ethanol-fixed substrates. A comparison between the ANA-IIFA titers and the p-ANCA results revealed that p-ANCA positivity was notably more common in samples with higher titers, and this correlation was found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Positive ANA results by IIFA tests are linked to a higher incidence of p-ANCA interpretation, particularly in cases with higher titer patterns. This insight aids laboratories in establishing effective workflows to investigate potential p-ANCA interference.