Abstract
Measurement of pH in IVF-media using the blood gas analyzer (BGA) requires validation, because IVF-media is outside the intended scope of the BGA. To determine whether the Siemens Rapidpoint 500 BGA is suitable for pH measurements in IVF-media this study will validate the BGA and assess its accuracy. In this method comparison study, the pH of over three hundred IVF-media samples was measured with the BGA and a pH electrode (Hanna pH checker). The precision of both the BGA and the pH electrode were excellent (coefficient variation <1.4%). However, the closeness of agreement between measured values of both devices were not equivalent to each other in the tested IVF-media, showing 15% to 85% accordance between devices. The pH measured with the blood gas analyzer was also significantly higher in the tested media, compared to that measured by the pH electrode. One of the tested media did not reach its target pH when it was measured with the BGA, even at 9% CO2. The results show that the validated blood gas analyzer produces excellent results in terms of precision but not in terms of accuracy. Inaccurate measurement may lead to misinterpretation of results and consequently to suboptimal culture conditions. Therefore, each laboratory is encouraged to perform a validation of their BGA.