Three Methods of Estimating Mesophyll Conductance Agree Regarding its CO₂ Sensitivity in the Rubisco-Limited C(i) Range

三种估算叶肉导度的方法在Rubisco限制的C(i)范围内对其CO₂敏感性的评估结果一致

阅读:1

Abstract

Whether the mesophyll conductance to CO₂ movement (g(m)) within leaves of C₃ plants changes with CO₂ concentration remains a matter of debate, particularly at low CO₂ concentrations. We tested for changes in g(m) over the range of sub-stomatal CO₂ concentrations (C(i)) for which Rubisco activity limited photosynthesis (A) in three plant species grown under the same conditions. Mesophyll conductance was estimated by three independent methods: the oxygen sensitivity of photosynthesis, variable J fluorescence combined with gas exchange, and the curvature of the Rubisco-limited A vs. C(i) curve. The latter assay used a new method of rapidly obtaining data points at approximately every 3 μmol mol(-1) for Rubisco-limited A vs. C(i) curves, allowing separate estimates of curvature over limited C(i) ranges. In two species, soybean and sunflower, no change in g(m) with C(i) was detected using any of the three methods of estimating g(m). In common bean measured under the same conditions as the other species, all three methods indicated large decreases in g(m) with increasing C(i). Therefore, change in g(m) with C(i) in the Rubsico-limited region of A vs. C(i) curves depended on the species, but not on the method of estimating g(m).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。