Abstract
AIMS: The aim of this study was to derive a weighted score model predicting success/failure of antegrade wire crossing in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred and four consecutive CTO cases (408 lesions) undergoing CTO-PCI between January 2009 and March 2015 were included. Data were divided into two sets, namely "derivation" and "validation", in a 70:30 ratio. The score was derived using multivariate analysis to identify independent predictors of wire crossing failure from the derivation set (n=285 lesions) and validated on the remaining 123 lesions (validation set). The overall procedural success rate was 83.6%. Independent predictors of CTO-PCI failure and their contribution to the weighted score were a blunt stump (beta coefficient 2.12), length of occlusion >20 mm (beta coefficient 1.71), presence of calcification (beta coefficient 0.72), presence of tortuosity (beta coefficient 1.06) and collateral with Rentrop grade <2 (beta coefficient 1.06). The respective scores allotted were +2.0, +1.5, +1, +1, +1 (total 6.5), rounding the coefficient to the nearest 0.5. Score values of 0-2, >2-4 and >4 were classified as low, intermediate and high levels of difficulty for CTO-PCI success and were associated with 98%, 74.2%, and 42.5% (p<0.0001), respectively, of antegrade wire crossing success in the derivation set. This was also validated on the validation set with CTO success in the three derived difficulty levels being 100%, 82.4% and 48.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our weighted angiographic CTO score is a strong predictor of final antegrade wire crossing success and could be used in day-to-day clinical practice of CTO interventions.