Abstract
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a massive disruption in access to care and thus passive, hospital- and clinic-based surveillance programs. In 2020, the reported cases of Lyme disease were the lowest both across the United States and North Carolina in recent years. During this period, human contact patterns began to shift with higher rates of greenspace utilization and outdoor activities, putting more people into contact with potential vectors and associated vector-borne diseases. Lyme disease reporting relies on passive surveillance systems, which were likely disrupted by changes in health care-seeking behavior during the pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify the likely under-ascertainment of cases of Lyme disease during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States and North Carolina. METHODS: We fitted publicly available, reported Lyme disease cases for both the United States and North Carolina prior to the year 2020 to predict the number of anticipated Lyme disease cases in the absence of the pandemic using a Bayesian modeling approach. We then compared the ratio of reported cases divided by the predicted cases to quantify the number of likely under-ascertained cases. We then fitted geospatial models to further quantify the spatial distribution of the likely under-ascertained cases and characterize spatial dynamics at local scales. RESULTS: Reported cases of Lyme Disease were lower in 2020 in both the United States and North Carolina than prior years. Our findings suggest that roughly 14,200 cases may have gone undetected given historical trends prior to the pandemic. Furthermore, we estimate that only 40% to 80% of Lyme diseases cases were detected in North Carolina between August 2020 and February 2021, the peak months of the COVID-19 pandemic in both the United States and North Carolina, with prior ascertainment rates returning to normal levels after this period. Our models suggest both strong temporal effects with higher numbers of cases reported in the summer months as well as strong geographic effects. CONCLUSIONS: Ascertainment rates of Lyme disease were highly variable during the pandemic period both at national and subnational scales. Our findings suggest that there may have been a substantial number of unreported Lyme disease cases despite an apparent increase in greenspace utilization. The use of counterfactual modeling using spatial and historical trends can provide insight into the likely numbers of missed cases. Variable ascertainment of cases has implications for passive surveillance programs, especially in the trending of disease morbidity and outbreak detection, suggesting that other methods may be appropriate for outbreak detection during disturbances to these passive surveillance systems.