Abstract
ObjectiveThe study aims to evaluate the between-day reliability of a proposed test battery for patients with claudication that can be used for monitoring the effectiveness of exercise interventions and other therapeutic strategies tailored to this patient population.MethodsTwenty-five men with claudication were recruited. The test battery consisted of the Vastus Lateralis muscle thickness (VL-MT), ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI), unilateral isometric knee extension maximal voluntary torque (MVT) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT). A single investigator conducted the tests for each patient on two separate testing sessions (T1 and T2) 5-7 days apart.ResultsGood to excellent reliability was observed for VL-MT (ICC = 0.95, 95% LOA = ±3.10 mm, SEM = 0.81 mm), ABI (ICC = 0.97, 95% LOA = ±0.10, SEM = 0.02), MVT (ICC = 0.97, 95% LOA = ±24.0 N·m, SEM = 6.31 N·m), 6MWT distance (ICC = 0.99, 95% LOA = ±39.6 m, SEM = 11.0 m), 6MWT time to claudication (ICC = 0.99, 95% LOA = ±30.8 s, SEM = 7.8 s), and 6MWT ratings of pain (ICC = 0.87, 95% LOA = ±2.4 CR-10(+), SEM = 0.7 CR-10(+) ). Analysis derived from reliability data indicates a change of 1.4 mm for VL-MT, 0.14 for ABI, 12 N·m for MVT, 25 m for 6MWT distance, 15 s for 6MWT time to claudication and 1 CR-10(+) for 6MWT ratings of pain is required to be interpreted as the minimum 'likely' change (76% chance).ConclusionsThe test battery provides a reliable assessment of patients with claudication and can be widely used to evaluate the effects of exercise programmes and other therapeutic interventions. For the individual, changes in VL-MT, ABI, MVT, and 6MWT greater than the minimum likely change as a result of an exercise programme or an intervention are likely changes and less influenced by error associated with the test.