Responsiveness of different MET tumour alterations to type I and type II MET inhibitors.

不同MET肿瘤改变对I型和II型MET抑制剂的反应性

阅读:10
作者:Murciano-Goroff Yonina R, Foglizzo Valentina, Chang Jason, Rekhtman Natasha, Sisk Ann Elizabeth, Gibson Jamie, Judka Lia, Clemens Kristen, Roa Paola, Ahmed Shaza Sayed, Bremer Nicole V, Binaco Courtney Lynn, Muzungu Sherifah Kemigisha, Rodriguez Estelamari, Merrill Madeline, Sgroe Erica, Repetto Matteo, Stadler Zsofia K, Berger Michael F, Yu Helena A, Toska Eneda, Kannan Srinivasaraghavan, Verma Chandra S, Drilon Alexander, Cocco Emiliano
BACKGROUND: Mutations in c-MET receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) can be primary oncogenic drivers of multiple tumour types or can be acquired as mechanisms of resistance to therapy. MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are classified as type I or type II inhibitors, with the former binding to the DFG-in, active conformation of MET, and the latter to the DFG-out, inactive conformation of MET. Understanding how the different classes of MET TKIs impact tumours with varied MET alterations is critical to optimising treatment for patients with MET altered cancers. Here, we characterise MET mutations identified in patients' tumours and assess responsiveness to type I and II TKIs. METHODS: We used structural modelling, in vitro kinase and in cell-based assays to assess the response of MET mutations to type I and II TKIs. We then translated our pre-clinical findings and treated patients with MET mutant tumours with selected inhibitors. RESULTS: We detected the emergence of four (three previously uncharacterised and one known) MET resistance mutations (MET(G1090A), MET(D1213H), MET(R1227K) and a MET(Y1230S)) in samples from patients with multiple solid tumours, including patients who had been previously treated with type I inhibitors. In silico modelling and biochemical assays across a variety of MET alterations, including the uncharacterised MET(G1090A) and the MET(Y1230S) substitutions, demonstrated impaired binding of type I but not of type II TKIs (i.e., cabozantinib/foretinib). Applying our pre-clinical findings, we then treated two patients (one with a non-small-cell lung cancer and one with a renal cell carcinoma) whose tumours harboured these previously uncharacterised MET alterations with cabozantinib, a type II MET TKI, and observed clinical responses. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive characterisation of the sensitivity of mutations to different TKI classes in oncogenic kinases may guide clinical intervention and overcome resistance to targeted therapies in selected cases. KEY POINTS: Kinase mutations in RTKs are primary or secondary drivers in multiple cancer types Some of these mutations confer resistance to type I but not to type II inhibitors in preclinical samples and in patients The biochemical characterization of mutations in oncogenic kinases based on their sensitivity to type I and type II inhibitors is crucial to inform clinical intervention.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。